meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:cs30a7400:2014:group4 [2014/10/29 16:00]
k5432
courses:cs30a7400:2014:group4 [2014/11/13 16:59] (current)
k5432
Line 65: Line 65:
   * Identify more opportunities for the political model.   * Identify more opportunities for the political model.
   * Working method selection.   * Working method selection.
 +
 +Our next meeting is on **16.10.2014**.
 +
 +=== Meeting of the 16th Oct 2014: ===
 +
 +Today'​s meeting was to present the results to the teacher and get feedback on which way to proceed based on the proposals of business ideas using Open Data.
 +
 +=== Results of the meeting ===
 +
 +  * The outcome of the meeting was to discard the transportation project since there are currently many other projects related to that issue.
 +  * Second comment was to identify carefully who would be the possible customer for the transparency project (politics).
 +  * Last comment was to identify carefully which information we want to show and if we wanted to keep students motivated, because if we show that job salaries by area of studies we would be influencing the choice of the students by the money, which is what we want to prevent.
  
 Our next meeting is on **27.10.2014**. Our next meeting is on **27.10.2014**.
Line 192: Line 204:
  
 There is not clear competence in this market, but there are environmental factors that would potentially constrain the scope or deployment of our system. Some politicians would not like to be analyzed because they can feel threatened. Some others would not agree with this systematic approach. There is not clear competence in this market, but there are environmental factors that would potentially constrain the scope or deployment of our system. Some politicians would not like to be analyzed because they can feel threatened. Some others would not agree with this systematic approach.
 +
 +Our next meeting is on **29-NOV-14** with the professor.
 +
 +
 +=== Meeting of the 29th Oct 2014: ===
 +
 +Today'​s meeting was to present in the elevator pitch format the presentation with the development of the ideas to get feedback and be able to tune our material for the final presentation to the teacher and classmates one week after this day.
 +
 +=== Results of the meeting ===
 +
 +Following points were taken as feedback from the teacher:
 +
 +  * Presentation was out of time by exceeding 2 minutes of time but the idea was good.
 +  * Suggestions were raised to offer related products for preventing the corruption to happen by analyzing the possible flags of a decision to be met before it's taken.
 +  * We were encouraged to look for environmental sustainable applications using open data with the algorithm.
 +  * Reinforce the point of the result of the application rather than in the algorithm that calculates everything.
 +  * Next meeting to prepare 1 slide only to present for the elevator pitch, but we all will present 15 minutes presentation with other students, for the second presentation we may use more slides.
 +
 +Our next meeting is on **03-NOV-14**.
  
 ==Next meeting on 03-NOV-14=== ==Next meeting on 03-NOV-14===
  
 +===Meeting on 03-NOV-14===
 +
 +==Tasks ===
 +
 +
 +  * Prepare elevator pitch presentation
 +  * Prepare 15 minutes presentation
 +  * Rehearse presentations ​
 +
 +==Final presentation on 03-NOV-14==
 +
 +**Final date of presentation was updated to the 13-NOV-14**
 +
 +==Final presentation on 13-NOV-14==
 +
 +
 +**Please find the file for the presentation below.**
 +
 +{{:​courses:​cs30a7400:​2014:​presentation_group_4_-_transparenfy.pptx|}}
 +
 +From the selling pitch presentation we got the following results:
 +
 +Green (Buying) - 5/6
  
-===Meeting on.......=== +Red (Not buying) - 1/6 
-  * .....+  * The arguments on which this negative response was based were wrong since the opposite concepts were explained during pitch and as a response from our team the concepts were mentioned again for the student and audience to clear any doubt
-  * ..... +  * Arguments: ​ 
-  ​* .... +  ​- People will need trainingFact: No training needed since customers only get the report
-  ​* ..... +  ​- Why to trust the results ?Fact: The report doesn'​t tell you to trust or not if it's corruption, it only indicates which happenings are suspicious (and why), the "​flags"​ should be analyzed so the customer tells by his judgement and knowledge.
  
-==Final presentation on ......==+Workload was splitted evenly and all members participated in all meetings.