meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:cs30a7400:2014:group4 [2014/10/29 17:06]
k5432
courses:cs30a7400:2014:group4 [2014/11/13 16:59] (current)
k5432
Line 226: Line 226:
 ==Next meeting on 03-NOV-14=== ==Next meeting on 03-NOV-14===
  
 +===Meeting on 03-NOV-14===
  
 +==Tasks ===
  
-===Meeting on.......=== 
-  * ...... 
-  * ..... 
-  * .... 
-  * .....  
  
-==Final presentation on ......==+  * Prepare elevator pitch presentation 
 +  * Prepare 15 minutes presentation 
 +  * Rehearse presentations  
 + 
 +==Final presentation on 03-NOV-14== 
 + 
 +**Final date of presentation was updated to the 13-NOV-14** 
 + 
 +==Final presentation on 13-NOV-14== 
 + 
 + 
 +**Please find the file for the presentation below.** 
 + 
 +{{:​courses:​cs30a7400:​2014:​presentation_group_4_-_transparenfy.pptx|}} 
 + 
 +From the selling pitch presentation we got the following results: 
 + 
 +Green (Buying) - 5/6 
 + 
 +Red (Not buying) - 1/6 
 +  * The arguments on which this negative response was based were wrong since the opposite concepts were explained during pitch and as a response from our team the concepts were mentioned again for the student and audience to clear any doubt. 
 +  * Arguments:  
 +  - People will need trainingFact: No training needed since customers only get the report. 
 +  - Why to trust the results ?. Fact: The report doesn'​t tell you to trust or not if it's corruption, it only indicates which happenings are suspicious (and why), the "​flags"​ should be analyzed so the customer tells by his judgement and knowledge. 
 + 
 +Workload was splitted evenly and all members participated in all meetings.