meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:cs30a7400:2014:group4 [2014/11/13 16:56]
k5432
courses:cs30a7400:2014:group4 [2014/11/13 16:59] (current)
k5432
Line 251: Line 251:
  
 Red (Not buying) - 1/6 Red (Not buying) - 1/6
--> The arguments on which this negative response was based were wrong since the opposite concepts were explained during pitch and as a response from our team they were mentioned again for the student and audience. +  * The arguments on which this negative response was based were wrong since the opposite concepts were explained during pitch and as a response from our team the concepts ​were mentioned again for the student and audience ​to clear any doubt
--> Arguments:  +  ​* ​Arguments:  
-1) People will need training. Fact: No training needed since customers only get the report. +  ​- ​People will need training. Fact: No training needed since customers only get the report. 
-2) Why to trust the results ?. Fact: The report doesn'​t tell you to trust or not if it's corruption, it only indicates which happenings are suspicious (and why), the "​flags"​ should be analyzed so the customer tells by his judgement and knowledge.+  ​- ​Why to trust the results ?. Fact: The report doesn'​t tell you to trust or not if it's corruption, it only indicates which happenings are suspicious (and why), the "​flags"​ should be analyzed so the customer tells by his judgement and knowledge.
  
 Workload was splitted evenly and all members participated in all meetings. Workload was splitted evenly and all members participated in all meetings.