meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:ct60a7000:spring2015:2:maksimainenjoonas [2015/04/16 23:23]
e0372184
courses:ct60a7000:spring2015:2:maksimainenjoonas [2015/04/17 11:12] (current)
e0372184
Line 33: Line 33:
 This is quite huge question, but because cloud computing has gained immensely interest as sustainable IT solution, students should understand, not only benefits but also possible negative issues or challenges of clouds. These are for example security issues. Deploying new sustainable technology may be green, but it can also cause problems. This is quite huge question, but because cloud computing has gained immensely interest as sustainable IT solution, students should understand, not only benefits but also possible negative issues or challenges of clouds. These are for example security issues. Deploying new sustainable technology may be green, but it can also cause problems.
  
-**3. Which one is more sustainable,​ change people who buy product or change product that people buy? Choose and explain why?**+**3. Which one is more sustainable,​ change people who buy product or change product that people buy? Choose and explain why.**
    
 This is good exam question, because it puts students to think the situation from many ways and raises more interesting questions about choosing more effective sustainable action. Would it be more effective and sustainable to concentrate on teaching people to behave more sustainable way; by teaching them for example to buy less and wasting less energy when using products? Or making products more and more recyclable and production more resource efficient? Even though we could make 100% recyclable product, which is practically impossible, will people bother to recycle it. The question about products lasting long and how often people change cellphone or buy new computer was raised in the 3rd seminar. Of course both changing people and products are important, but this question puts students to critically think their options'​ pros and cons more closely. This is good exam question, because it puts students to think the situation from many ways and raises more interesting questions about choosing more effective sustainable action. Would it be more effective and sustainable to concentrate on teaching people to behave more sustainable way; by teaching them for example to buy less and wasting less energy when using products? Or making products more and more recyclable and production more resource efficient? Even though we could make 100% recyclable product, which is practically impossible, will people bother to recycle it. The question about products lasting long and how often people change cellphone or buy new computer was raised in the 3rd seminar. Of course both changing people and products are important, but this question puts students to critically think their options'​ pros and cons more closely.
Line 41: Line 41:
 This question is mainly for students to think and adapt their knowledge of the course material and seminars to practical situations. The knowledge is useless if you cannot utilize it. This question is mainly for students to think and adapt their knowledge of the course material and seminars to practical situations. The knowledge is useless if you cannot utilize it.
   ​   ​
 +== Course work for missing Coursera diploma ==
  
-== Presentation ​grades ​==+The critical thinking means in short a clear and very reasoned thinking also involving critique. According to the Critical Thinking Community, the critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing,​ applying, analyzing, synthesizing,​ and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation,​ experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication,​ as a guide to belief and action. The first reference is book called Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs To Survive in a Rapidly Changing World by Paul Richard and Binker A. J. A. and it is good for understanding the overall meaning of critical thinking. Also the book offers several practical approaches to use critical thinking. The second is the website of Critical Thinking Community, which also offers different critical thinking methods and help inter alia for healthcare and several different school ​grades ​and teaching. The third offers very short and practical version of critical thinking but also critical reading, in which the website is concentrating.
  
-On the scale from to 5:+The usefulness of these pages for the course is that students learn to separate different types of arguments ​from each other, and that way to observer comments of their fellow students in seminars. When students know how to think critically, they are more eager to make questions and comments to correct false statements. Also when learning to think critically, students are more observant about the books they read, and willing to find more proof to what they read.
  
-Anowarul Abedin 5+The fourth and fifth reference give also useful information about argumentation,​ which is essential when doing presentation. Knowing how to convince others makes showing the proof more effective and makes detection of suspicious information easy. Also the most important thing is that when doing argumentation,​ students have their proof and references to show. In conclusion, with all these references students know how to criticize the information they receive and be observant what they say and read.
  
-Aron Asgedom 4+**References:​**
  
-Hanieh Esmaeilpourmotlagh 4+1. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs To Survive in a Rapidly Changing World; Paul, Richard W.; Binker, A. J. A., Ed; 1990
  
-Anastasiia Gusakova 4+[[http://​eric.ed.gov/?​id=ED338557|http://​eric.ed.gov/?​id=ED338557]]
  
-Sini Järvela ​-+2. [[http://​www.criticalthinking.org/​pages/​defining-critical-thinking/​766|http://​www.criticalthinking.org/​pages/​defining-critical-thinking/​766]]
  
-HeidiMaria Korhonen 5+3. [[http://​www.criticalreading.com/​critical_thinking.htm|http://​www.criticalreading.com/​critical_thinking.htm]]
  
-Lakshmi Prasanna Kuchimanchi ​4+4. [[http://​www.webpages.uidaho.edu/​crit_think/​Chapter-Three-1.htm|http://​www.webpages.uidaho.edu/​crit_think/​Chapter-Three-1.htm]]
  
-Henri Mikkola 4 +5. [[http://​www.wnc.edu/​~kille/​Fred/​Eng101crtclthnkng.rtf|http://​www.wnc.edu/​~kille/​Fred/​Eng101crtclthnkng.rtf]]
- +
-Tommi Nivanaho 4 +
- +
-Niklas Nygren 3 +
- +
-Funmilade Odukomaiya 4 +
- +
-Saliu Shehu 4 +
- +
-Juuso Valkki ​5+
  
 == Missed lectures == == Missed lectures ==