meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:ct60a7000:spring2015:final_presentation [2015/04/13 10:09]
k3432
courses:ct60a7000:spring2015:final_presentation [2015/04/16 10:22] (current)
m6461
Line 43: Line 43:
  
  
-Hello, i would like to work with Funmilade,( How critical thinking and argumentation could be helpful to define sustainability **(main responsibility Funmilade, Shehu)**+Hello, i would like to work with Funmilade,( How critical thinking and argumentation could be helpful to define sustainability **(main responsibility Funmilade, Shehu; Lakshmi Prasanna Kuchimanchi)** 
 + 
 + 
 +Hello, I updated my contents in the new presentation file shared by Heidi. Please have a look and feel free to edit. I added the summary of our discussion in three seminars. The points from Henri and Tola are also mentioned. Those were nice discussions to share with others and there are three slides for three seminars. May be different persons can present each of the slides. 
 + 
 +Also I modified the slides'​ flow of sequence. I think, it would be better to discuss the books at first and then the summary of our seminars. We will mention in the summary that the metrics of sustainability are not defined and as a group, we worked on it too. After the summary, metrics of sustainability will come as our Group Homework update and will be followed by how critical thinking helped us throughout the course.  
 + 
 +Anyway, feel free to edit anything. 
 + 
 + 
 +** BR, Abedin (16 April 2015, 10:20 am) **